Is *Japan Sinks: 2020* just "an unprepared family thrown into a disaster"?

Spot the anomalies
How reading tools work

Listen reads the article aloud. Speed read shows phrases in sequence at your chosen pace. Language practice compares available translations. Save keeps a bookmark in this browser; find it in the player’s bookmarks. Play this article as Breakout turns its own words into bricks for you to knock out.

Share this article
Advertisement
Advertisement

Pretty much, yes. But it is less a lesson in disaster prep than a show about what happens when an ordinary family loses every safety net that city life quietly gives them, one after another. The official story is exactly that: a perfectly normal Tokyo family trying to escape after a massive earthquake [1][2].

City life only works because roads, running water, power, hospitals, firefighters, phone networks, deliveries, and government all keep running at the same time. The opening episodes knock those out one by one. Tokyo Tower snaps. A helicopter crashes before it ever gets to be the "help is coming" moment. Something industrial explodes. Roads split open. Low ground floods.

In a monster movie, you can at least run away from Godzilla. In Japan Sinks: 2020, the enemy is the ground, the water, and everything that stops working. You can't outrun the ground. It comes with you.

Director Masaaki Yuasa has said the production drew on memories of the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake and on disaster simulations, and that he wanted viewers to notice what had been protecting ordinary people all along [3]. That's why the show rarely gives you the big overhead view of the whole country. The fear comes from not knowing: something blew up over there, and the road you just walked on is now water.

1. Tokyo is basically gone by Episode 1

The amount of destruction early on is wild. Tokyo Tower doesn't just bend heroically; the top breaks and hangs off. Then a burning helicopter spins out of control and falls. Once the rescue vehicle itself is wreckage, the usual disaster-movie safety blanket ("someone will come save us eventually") is gone.

Then there's a huge explosion somewhere that looks like an industrial area. Big quakes can break pipes, tanks, electrical gear, and fuel facilities all at once, so fires, chemical leaks, and follow-up explosions are a real city danger. The show doesn't stop to explain. It just puts a distant boom on screen, and you end up asking the same thing as the family: power plant? Factory? What just blew up?

Then phones and social media start saying Okinawa has sunk. Okinawa is a chain of islands, not a continent, but at this point the pace is pure Dragon Quest VII.

Tokyo: offline.
Roads: offline.
Helicopter: offline.
Industrial zone: offline.
Okinawa: map data looks sketchy.

Most disaster movies save "Tokyo is destroyed" for the big finale. This show uses it as the tutorial.

2. The tsunami doesn't show up as a giant wall of water

One of the smartest choices is what the show doesn't show. The official synopsis of Episode 2 says rising water threatens the shrine where the family is sheltering [4]. You don't get a big wave filling the screen. You just notice that roads and low ground are already underwater, and the water is creeping up toward higher places.

That actually fits how real tsunamis behave. A tsunami isn't always one clean blue wall like in the movies. Along coasts and rivers it can come in as a fast rise in water level with strong currents, and it can come again and again. The Japan Meteorological Agency tells people near the coast or rivers to get to high ground or a tsunami evacuation building right away and not to go back until the warning is lifted [5].

So "I'll run once I see the wave" is way too late. The show's "wait, when did the water get this high?" feeling is creepier because it's low-key.

The show came out in 2020, 9 years after the 3.11 disaster, and it matters that it didn't turn the tsunami into a flashy set piece. That said, I couldn't find any primary source where Yuasa says he left out a giant wave out of respect for 3.11, so that stays a guess, not a fact.

3. Are M7 earthquakes common? Worldwide, yes. M9.5 is a different beast

If you're wondering whether M7 quakes happen on a global scale: somewhere in the world, they happen every year, quite a few times. USGS long-term records put it at about 15 M7-range quakes and about one M8+ quake per year [6]. Over roughly the last 10 years, the average is about 13 M7-range quakes a year [7].

The biggest earthquake ever recorded is the 1960 Chile quake at M9.5 [8]. Magnitude is logarithmic, so an M9.5 releases roughly 5,600 times the energy of an M7.

But an M7 doesn't shake the whole planet equally. Damage depends on where it hits, how deep it is, the ground, how many people live there, the buildings, and whether there's a tsunami. One big reason civilization survives disasters is that the places that didn't get hit can step in. They send food, doctors, workers, power equipment, and phone gear.

What makes Japan Sinks: 2020 scary is that those backup places start going down too. It's like Tokyo goes dark, everyone switches over to Osaka, and then Osaka starts going dark as well. The disaster takes out the backup plan along with everything else.

For the record, USGS says no known fault could realistically produce an M10 or bigger quake [9]. An M12 would need a fault bigger than the Earth.

Go all the way back to Earth's early days, though, and you hit the giant impact thought to have formed the Moon. NASA describes a Mars-sized body, often called Theia, slamming into the young Earth about 4.5 billion years ago [10]. That's not "what magnitude was it" anymore. That's the planet getting rebuilt. Disaster plan: everyone's done.

4. Can a whole continent sink in one go? Not like in Dragon Quest VII

There's no confirmed case of an entire continent sliding under the sea within minutes or hours from a single quake. Big earthquakes have dropped coastlines by meters, but deleting a whole continent in a day is on another level.

A mostly underwater continent does exist, though. Zealandia, around New Zealand, covers about 4.9 million square kilometers, and GNS Science says about 94% of it is below sea level [11]. But it wasn't land yesterday and sea today. Its crust stretched and thinned as it split off from Gondwana, over an enormously long stretch of geological time.

Real Earth: "I'll sink it over tens of millions of years."
Dragon Quest VII: "Stone tablet event. Island gone."
Japan Sinks: 2020: "New world map, about one episode later."

Any geologist would call that processing speed a bug.

5. Road, mountain, or river? Each one has its own trap

"If the roads are cracking, wouldn't the mountains be safer?" Makes sense, but it's not that simple.

In a big quake, roads can crack, buckle, lose bridges, and have their embankments collapse, and liquefaction can warp them. Japan's Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism notes that liquefaction can deform road surfaces, push manholes and buried pipes up, and make whole areas of ground flow [12].

Mountains have landslides, falling rocks, and mudflows. Rivers are tempting as a water source, but they can flood, their banks and levees can give way, and near the sea a tsunami can run up them. Japan's government designates evacuation sites by type of disaster (tsunami, landslides and mudflows, floods, earthquakes, and so on) because a place that's safe from one disaster isn't always safe from another [13].

If you had to sum it up in one line: flat high ground, far enough from the sea and rivers, away from steep slopes, cliffs, and valleys, that you know is safe.

So it's not "head for the mountains." It's "head for safe high ground." In this show the roads crack, the water creeps in, and the mountains might come down too. The difficulty setting for picking terrain is just brutal.

6. River + wild boar = we'll be fine? More food, but the food fights back

Once the family reaches the mountains, survival resources suddenly appear. The river is water, the forest is firewood, and a wild boar is a whole lot of meat and fat. You go from sharing a single 500 mL bottle in the city to "there's running water" and "dinner is walking around."

But clear-looking river water isn't automatically safe to drink. After a disaster, it can carry sewage, mud, oil, and germs. Boiling can deal with a lot of the biological stuff, but not with chemical contamination.

And then the boar. Official promo material shows Dad Koichiro wrestling one [14]. From a normal person's point of view, it goes like this:

Human: "Meat!"
Boar: "Meat!"

If you can bring it down, it's a lot of calories. But wild game can carry hepatitis E and parasites, and Japan's health ministry says to cook it until the center hits 75°C for at least 1 minute, or something equivalent [15]. And with no power, there's no fridge. A big animal is a lot of food, but also a lot of homework you have to finish before it spoils.

7. A 500 mL bottle, big appetites, and bare feet: the boring stuff matters most

Early on, a single 500 mL bottle of water feels incredibly precious. On a normal day you might chug it in one go. When the taps are dry, it belongs to everyone. The grandpa sipping it slowly looks cute, but he's actually doing great resource management.

People who are bigger, more muscular, or more active generally need more food and more water. If everyone gets the same ration, the "high-mileage" bodies run short first. And in short-term survival, dehydration becomes a problem much faster than hunger.

Then there's going barefoot. Really bad idea. After a big quake, the streets are full of broken glass, nails, metal scraps, rubble, and dirty water. Cut your foot and it's not just "ouch": you lose the ability to walk well, risk infection, and may not find anyone to treat it. Triple combo.

In a game, shoes are boring starter gear. In real life, they're a rare drop.

Sword: you can walk without it.
Shoes: without them, you can't.

Go full wild child if you have to. Just keep your feet civilized.

8. Dad Koichiro: the guy whose value skyrockets when civilization shuts down

Dad Koichiro is strong. Even Netflix's own description calls him a dependable father with survival skills [2]. He leads them along mountain paths, finds water, fights a boar, and gets it all the way to butchered and cooked.

In normal city life, the skills people value might be computers, certifications, languages, or professional experience. Once everything stops, the valuable skills suddenly become handling fire, finding food, dealing with animals, reading the land, keeping the family moving, and reacting fast to injuries and danger. Koichiro instantly turns into the ultra-rare character everyone wants on their team.

So you start thinking, "As long as Dad's here, they'll make it." And the show seems to have set that up just to smash it.

He digs for a wild yam for his hungry daughter.
The shovel hits metal.
An unexploded bomb.
Boom.

The survival expert gets taken out in the middle of a yam-digging tutorial.

He doesn't die in a heroic last stand or a grand sacrifice. Even someone with great survival skills is gone after one step on a danger he couldn't see. Suddenly the show's rule is "you can die just from bad luck." That out-of-nowhere moment is one of the show's most powerful hooks, and also one of the reasons people are split on it. A disaster-preparedness expert interviewed about the show also named the "yam and unexploded bomb" scene as especially shocking [16].

9. Why does such a strong disaster show only get 3.1 on Filmarks?

On Filmarks, a major Japanese review site, the anime sat at 3.1 from 4,238 reviews as of August 26, 2026. The split is clear: 11% gave it 4.1–5.0, 45% gave 3.1–4.0, 30% gave 2.1–3.0, and 14% gave 1.0–2.0 [17].

If you've only seen the start, 3.1 seems low. The destruction of Tokyo, not knowing what's going on, the flooding, the broken roads, the water and food problems: it all hits hard.

On the other hand, the negative reviews complain that deaths come out of nowhere, the story gets scattered, and that people expecting a realistic disaster-survival story got something else. Even the official site calls it a show that sparked heated debate after it streamed [18].

Judging by the opening alone, the show's appeal isn't teaching you the right things to do in a disaster. It's showing how fragile daily life gets when the huge safety net of civilization is peeled away, one layer at a time.

Tokyo Tower snaps.
The helicopter goes down.
The roads crack.
The water quietly moves in.
The boar looks like food, until you realize you're on its menu too.
And the strongest dad in the party blows up digging for a yam.

The opening of Japan Sinks: 2020 is less a disaster anime than an endurance test where civilization's backups get switched off one by one.


Next about the same story: Japan Sinks: 2020, Episodes 1–4: Review and Analysis

AdBooks on this topic

This article contains affiliate links (ads). About advertising As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Read this today

Each one answers a question readers of this article tend to ask next.

Browse all articlesMore on Anime

If this article helped you, you can support the site. Support

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Find other articles

All articles

Mendoi-chan

Who runs this site

Mendoi-chan

She turns friction at work and in everyday life into clear structure and practical next steps.